The pricing of risk refers to the incremental compensation required by investors for taking on additional risk, which may be measured by interest rates or fees. Several scholars have argued that a lack of transparency about banks' risk exposures prevented markets from correctly pricing risk before the crisis, enabled the mortgage market to grow larger than it otherwise would have, and made the financial crisis far more disruptive than it would have been if risk levels had been disclosed in a straightforward, readily understandable format.
Is there an answer to this question (If it cannot be answered, say "unanswerable"): According to several scholars, what prevented markets from correctly pricing risk before the crisis?
lack of transparency about banks' risk exposures