What is a question about this article? If the question is unanswerable, say "unanswerable".

In Australia, a technical issue arose with the royal assent in both 1976 and 2001. In 1976, a bill originating in the House of Representatives was mistakenly submitted to the Governor-General and assented to. However, it was later discovered that it had not been passed by each house. The error arose because two bills of the same title had originated from the house. The Governor-General revoked the first assent, before assenting to the bill which had actually passed. The same procedure was followed to correct a similar error which arose in 2001.

How was the case of two bills mistakenly assented corrected both in 1796 and 2001?
The Governor-General revoked the first assent, before assenting to the bill which had actually passed